Powered by Blogger.
Showing posts with label Camera. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Camera. Show all posts

Lens Test - Nikon 28-105mm 3.5-4.5D

Monday, February 19, 2024

 This is a bargain of a lens I purchased from KEH. 

The range this lens provided was fairly nice.  It is much lighter than the 35-70mm, plus it has a nice 1/2 Macro feature. 

I tested this out with my new Nikon to Sony E mount adapter, no electronics, so all manual focus. 

Camera - Sony A7Sii.  

Nikon 35mm f1.8 DX. ISO200, 1/13sec. Shot handheld.
This lens' focusing motor stopped working.  Kind of pissed.  Apparently a common issue. 

Lens Test

Sunday, July 12, 2009




Pentax screw mount 135mm, f3.5, all shots were set to f5.6. No filter.
Camera - Olympus E500.

Most of the shots were very flat, lacking contrast. But it was during mid day, a bit on the cloudy side. I had to adjust the contrast to bring out the pop.

Because of the "smaller" optical view finder, it is a little more difficult to shot with manual lens, say, compared with the Pentax DL.

With the current state of my eye sight, it's very difficult to play with manual focus lens, it doesn't help that the M42 adapter I have does not offer AF confirmation, which would help me out a great deal.



Posted by Picasa

New toys

Thursday, April 23, 2009



Well, I finally ordered some center pinch lens caps for my Olympus. I know, it says Nikon, but heck, the price was nice, and I am definitely tired of trying to take the lens cap off with the lens hood on. This is a must have!



Also purchased the M42 to Olympus 4/3 mount adapter. This is a cheapy little item, helps me to add a few extra lenses that I can use with the E500, but unfortunately, this version does not have AF confirmation (like the Pentax). The other thing is, the view finder is a little more difficult to get right on, due to smaller size with the Olympus camera. I might have to invest in a focus screen. But heck, it's still fun to mount the SMC 50mm lens on it.
Posted by Picasa

Flash Test

Wednesday, December 3, 2008

Unscientific Diffuser/Bounce test:

LumiQuest Pocket Bouncer and Sto-fen Omni-Bounce



Direct - Left: no diffusion. Right: With Omni-Bounce



45 degree- Left: no diffusion. Right: With Omni-Bounce



90 degree- Left: no diffusion. Right: With Omni-bounce



LumiQuest - Pocket Bouncer


Camera setup: Nikon D80, Program mode, White Balance, daylight. Flash - SB600, I didn't flip the built-in diffusion of SB600 over the lens.

Looking at these pictures, I am pleasantly surprised that no diffuser, 90 degree (bounce off of ceiling) is my top pick, but I find direct and 90 degree with Omni-bounce to be very close, and pleasant.

For convenience, it's more likely for me to use the Omni-bounce. Remember, this require a little experiment for different conditions.

Another product, that I do not have, but have seen the result, is the Gary Fong's Lightsphere. I don't know why, but the way Lightsphere spread out the light makes it really nice on skin tone.

Article notice

Monday, May 12, 2008

Here is a very interesting article regarding tilt-shift lens:

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/focusing-ts.shtml


Looks like an interesting piece of equipment.

Small technical issue

Sunday, March 16, 2008

Yellowing issue with the SMC 50mm, pictures come out, well, yellowish. See above.
*

shot with 50mm - Pentax DL

Same location, shot with Canon G2.
Big difference with the output. I set both cameras to Auto white balance, program mode. Found some instruction on how to address this issue, http://pentax-manuals.com/repairs/yellow.htm, will give it a shot.
Here's a shot of the lens with against the white background. You can see the yellowing. I will put the prime only experiment on-hold for now, until I get my pancake lens in.
*

Group Shot

Wednesday, March 12, 2008




Here's a family portrait, :), of my manual screw mount (and 1 K-mount) prime collection.
28mm, Sears f2.8
50mm, Pentax SMC f1.4
50mm, Pentax-M SMC f2
55mm, Ricoh f2.8
55mm, Ricoh f1.4
135mm, Pentax Super Takumar, f3.5


Of these bunch, I like the Ricoh 55mm f1.4 (I consider it to be very sharp), and the Pentax 135mm.
The 50mm SMC f1.4, although a nice lens, it does have slight yellowing, so I don't use it as much.

Shooting manual is fun, and these old lenses are vey low cost, if you shop around, and set your limit when bidding on EBay. Most of these I bid on EBay, in the Camera/Lens combo. I have found that sometimes, it is cheaper to buy them in the combo setup, than the stand alone lens. Since I like to display older cameras as works of art, it's a win-win situation for me (well, sometimes).

A few things I have learned:
1 - Screw mount lenses are readily available, a little cheaper, too. But you do have to buy an adapter to use it with your digital SLR, check for availability for your camera mount.

2 - How's your eye-sight? Manual focus is getting harder and harder for me, this damn aging thing :~(, a big, bright view finder will really help. Pentax SLR (at least with DL), has a Focus Lock indicator (beeps) to let you know you are in focus.

3 - Another thing about using M42 lens is with the auto/manual stop down. I am not very good at explaining this, since I don't fully understand this operation, but read this Wiki. The issue is that I have to open up the aperture to frame and focus, then set my aperture setting, then take a meter reading.

4 - Screw mount lenses are slower to mount/unmount. As the name, you have to screw on/off the lens from your camera body. It does take several turns. I prefer to use bayonet mount if possible.

5 - Prime is not as flexible as zoom. Sure, people suggest that we should use the manual zoom - our legs to walk to different position before taking the shot, but if I am at Grand Canyon, this might mean some hiking before I can reach the perfect location for the shot; if I can still have the energy to hold the camera then, :). Consider this limitation, or feature carefully.


My up coming experiment is to take off the kit zoom lens off of my DL, and keep a prime on it for minimum of 2 month at a time. Let me see if I have the discipline to do it, and see if it will change the way of seeing through the lens.
I'll start off by using the SMC 50mm f1.4, I'll have to live with the yellowish pictures I guess, :). I will mark my calendar - let's say until end of May. Wish myself luck!


Posted by Picasa

New Sony DSLR announcements

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

Sony announced A200, a replacement of their first foray into the DSLR market, the A100, in CES. A lot of people were surprised that it is not a very big improvement over the A100. Well, Sony waited til the PMA (photo marketing association), to announce 2 more entry level DSLRs, A300 and the A350. You can read more about them here.

These are very interesting announcements, price wise, they are fairly competitive, which is good for the consumers. There are some key features I like, and a lot of people have been happy with their Sony Alphas. I found this Minolta/Alpha mount forum, http://www.dyxum.com/index.asp, check it out, I found a lot of camaraderie amongst members, a very nice community, not a lot of hostilities.

One thing I am wondering about all of these recent camera announcements, is that with a recession going on, who's buying them, where's the money coming from? It really looks like some of the hot cameras (Nikon D3/D300) are flying off the shelves; are people using their tax refunds to purchase these new toys?

Right now, I think the best DSLR deal is the Pentax K10D. With a $100 rebate (sorry for the late notice, it ends 1/31/2008), you can get it for $509 after rebate (body only)! That's INSANE! Too bad I don't have the money now, :), doing a kitchen remodeling......

Sigma DP1

Availability for this camera is now set for "Spring". See DPReview for more info. This can be a significant camera due to its use of DSLR sized sensor.

Nikon D60 Announcement

Tuesday, January 29, 2008

Go over to DPReview, Nikon has officially released D60, which is a D40x replacement, along with a host of digicams, and a couple of lenses:
PC-E 24mm
AF-S 60mm Micro
AF-S DX 16-85mm VR

D60 (isn't that a Canon?) is a consumer oriented DSLR with some high end features borrowed from D3/D300. Looks like the direction is that Nikon has decided to keep built-in motor out of the body, auto-focus is only supported with AF-S, AF-I lenses.

I have tried out a D40, and I like the big bright view finder, and the big LCD (compared to 1.8 inch on the D70). The only reason that would keep me from buying a d40, d40x, or d60 is that they do not support older AF lens. My AF 50mm f1.8, and AF 80-200mm f2.8 will not autofocus on these bodies. The other thing is the sensor based shake reduction system. I don't think Nikon or Canon will go that direction.

Update - Letsgodigital actually has a fairly comprehensive review of the D60, click here.

New (old) toy

Thursday, January 24, 2008

With all the hoopla of new camera announcements, I decided to get an oldie but goodie.

Fresh Ebay purchase - Canon G2, only 4 megapixel, flip-out LCD and optical view finder, hot-shoe (works with my remote flash trigger!), raw support, 34-102mm f2.0 - f2.5 lens (sweet!). Only missing the remote control and USB cable, oh, the manual is in Spanish, but downloaded the manual right off Canon web site, no problemo, :). Well, for 50 bucks, not bad.




Flip-out LCD, nice feature to have in certain situations.


Battery and charger seemed to work well. Checked online (Ritz camera actually), I can get a replacement battery for about $15.
The camera is actually kind of heavy, but I like the way it looks, a lot like a rangefinder camera.

With the hype of megapixel race from camera makers, it's nice to get back to the basics. Can't wait for better weather condition to test this camera out. This being the second generation of the G series from Canon (G9 is the current model, and it is highly rated), it has been around for some time now - released around August 2001. In digital camera terms, this camera is ancient! My purchase seems to be in fairly good shape, small amount of scratches here and there, but overall in very nice condition. Pop a CF card in, and took a few in-door shots, flash worked without problem, and pictures are nice quality as far as I can see. Focus is slow, and of course, shutter lag is there, what the heck, it's from 2001, :)!


Hmmm, I am wondering what other older digital camera people are still using?
Posted by Picasa

Neat Pentaxian video

Sunday, January 13, 2008

Found this video while browsing through Pentax Gallery. This is a featured photographer who uses Pentax gear - Kerrick James. Check out the video - it was actually near Flagstaff (although I have no idea where they did the rock climbing). They didn't emphasize it, but I believe part of the video was filmed at Verde Valley (the train). I am curious where the lake scene was shot.

While there, check out other featured Pentaxians, especially Julie Quarry, really great work and inspirational.

More new camera rumors -

Friday, January 11, 2008

From my earlier link to the Pentax K20D rumor, now there's more information surfacing about the Samsung model, the GX-20 rumor. Even Letsgodigital has a post on this camera.

Quick spec - 14.6 Megapixel CMOS sensor (goodbye Sony?), up to 3200 ISO. 2.7" LCD, and the same weather sealing as K10d or GX-10.

Looks like Pentax will make the official announcement on January 24th.
Along the way, K100d replacement K200d will be announce on the same day.

Lens Testing

After reviewing a few articles about lens sharpness, I thought I'd conduct my own little test.
But as I was setting up the test subject (card board box and paint swatch), I started to wonder: So is there a basic rule we need to follow on sharpness testing?

I have seen pictures of brick wall, news paper article, fertilizer box, etc. Is there a distance limit? Light condition? Should a standard scene be utilized? Just curious.

The test was performed with my favorite manual portrait lens, a Ricoh 55mm f1.4. I started with f1.4, and went up to f11. The smallest aperture is f16, I didn't go to that one because amount of light I have at time of testing. Camera is my Pentax DL.

The camera was mounted on a tripod, subject was 6 feet away from camera. No flash, just available light.


This is full size picture. The letter K (SINK) is near center.
At f1.4

At f2.0

At f2.8

At f4

At f5.6

At f8

At f11

I manually cropped each shot from Picasa, so the crop size varies from each sample.
I think the results are very interesting. Letter K being my center point, it is actually pretty sharp through out the aperture range. The corner (barcode and #31.5) of the lens are very soft from f1.4 to f2.8, then at f4, it started to get better.
I was expecting the image to be very sharp at f5.6. But f5.6 is still a little soft, but I am suspecting camera movement, since letter K shows a slight fuzziness.
Conclusion, well, nothing much than what I already suspected. For my portrait shots, most important point is the center of the shot, so corner softness is not so bad, the softness also add to the bokeh most people are after. I am more curious at what test methodology should utilize. Maybe there's a standard testing method that us poor home users can use.

Using Tele at Grand Canyon

Tuesday, January 1, 2008

Another trip to Grand Canyon, but this time, I only used my 80-200mm lens.

I usually use wide angle, but just can't capture the "GRAND" of the canyon. So I thought I'd try something different this time.

I think I like the way some of them turned out. We stayed til after sunset (for the first time), the light was nice. Everything was hand held, it was a little tough because it was very cold and windy. Things I do for a few shots, :) It was well worth it. Snow on the cliffs adds a nice touch. I really like some type of image stablization assistance. Hoping Nikon will make it an in-body feature, but I don't think that's the direction they are going with recent introduction of their VR lenses. Do I have to go with Pentax, Sony, or Olympus? I know, I should've take my tripod on every photo trip....


Shot right before sunset; it's funny, the snow behind the boulder is still hanging in there.


Shot after sunset, manual setting, f2.8, I think I shot it at 1/50th of a second. From Moran Point. I wish I had brought my tripod.


Silhouette - After sunset.


From Desert view, 2 hours before sunset. This is the shaded side, so snow is still abundant.

Oh, and Happy New Year!
Posted by Picasa

Buying an Digital SLR?

Thursday, December 20, 2007

Although I have not outgrown my current DSLRs, I still dream about a new DSLR body, I dunno, doesn't cost anything to dream, I guess, :). I am using D70, Pentax DL, and Canon SD400 (carry around).


I created a list of features that I use to justify a possible purchase, and hopefully might be helpful to others who's looking into buying their first DSLR, or upgrade. The list is not in any order of importance:

  1. Existing gear.
  2. TYpe of memory card.
  3. Handling and feel of the camera.
  4. Purpose.
  5. Anti-shake, vibration reduction.
  6. Sensor cleaning feature.
  7. Size and resolution of LCD display.
  8. View finder.
  9. Keep your old digital P&S.
  10. Battery type.

1 - Do you currently own a SLR? Are the old lenses compatible with the DSLR system you are considering?

You will soon realize that your investment does not stop at camera body and the kit lens, but additional lens will soon be on your shopping list, and they don't come cheap. If you have considerable investment in quality glasses already, consider a DSLR with the same lens mount. For people who have older flashes, it actually does not make too much of a difference. Most modern DSLR incorporates a new type of TTL system that older flashes may not support. Don't throw them away, because it is possible for you to use them for off camera flash in the future.


2 - Existing memory cards: this is really not a big deal any more. The cost of compact flash and SD format are so cheap now, even if they are not compatible with the new system you are looking at, it is really not much to spend down the road. With 2GB SD card costing 20 bucks or so, this shouldn't be a limiting factor in the DSLR purchase any more.


3 - Handling: this is really more about how it feels in your hands.
Pick one up, and see how it feels. Wrap your fingers around the grip and see if it is comfortable. How does the surface of the camera feel? What about the size, is it too big, too small, too heavy?


Will your spouse/partner be using this camera, too? Get him/her to try it out also. Many newer cameras are heading towards the pettite size, some are comfortable, while some sacrifice comfort for people with larger hands - this might be important as you try to justify an upgrade later on, :~).


4 - Purpose: Define reasons why you are making this purchase.
Making larger prints? Faster autofocus performance, frames per second (sporting events)? Wildlife photography (super tele)? Perhaps going pro, or the business of Wedding photography?

I always refer to Thom Hogan's article on print size (http://www.bythom.com/printsizes.htm) based on megapixel (MP). I have made 11x13 prints with images from my D70, I'd say I am very happy with the print. Since both of my cameras are 6mp, to make the jump based on MP, I really need to go to 10MP, since there's not a big difference between 6 and 8 MP to justify the upgrade - if that's the only feature.

Will I make bigger prints than that? I am not sure, most likely no. In my research, I am considering higher MP count mainly because I do considerable cropping on some shots. But if you see a need to make larger prints in your future, you do have to factor in higher megapixel count. But if your shots are mostly viewing on compurer screen, or occasional 5x7 (or even 8x10), 6 MP cameras will do just fine, the money saved can be put toward additional lens or other accessories (flash, tripod, bags, etc).

Regarding faster focus performance, or shutter lag, I am mainly comparing this with point and shoot digitals, and there's really no comparison. I have not used that many SLR systems, but I know between my Nikon and Pentax (with kit 18-55 mm lens), Pentax is on the sluggish side, but it should still satisfy normal every day use.

Lens availability - both new and used. I purchased the Pentax camera simply because I want to use some of the older Pentax offerings (screw mount and manual k-mount). They are cheap and widely available from Ebay and used camera stores, and some are incredibly sharp. The ability to use older Pentax screw mount lens is not limited to Pentax cameras only, Canon and Olympus both can utilize a mounting kit, and allow you to use these widely available lenses. But the idea is mainly for future growth. A camera maker may offer 50 plus lenses in their line up, but that does not mean you have to purchase everyone of them! But broader offering is a way to glance into the future of your current investment. You may not need it now, but once you move to the next level with your photographic skill, having that special lens as an available option can be important.



Wedding photography - This is one area where "image" plays an important part. Image as in the type of gear you are using. If you show up at a paid assignment with Nikon D40, which uncle Joe and a host of others might also be using, it may create an issue for future assignment, in which bride/groom may think "so and so can do this for us, he/she's got the same camera!". I know, its the final product that counts, but booming DSLR market has created a slight problem in this regard. I am not saying you should purchase a Canon Mark III, Nikon D3, that's not the case. But mid range prosumer models might be the minimum you have to purchase.

5 - Built-in stabilization/anti-shake: Since I have already bought into the Nikon line, and my next camera body will most likely be another Nikon, this does not look promising for me. If I am starting out now on a new system, I'd have to say this is a very nice feature to have. If you ever had to take your tripod with you to shoot low light scene, that extra weight and bulkiness of the tripod is really a drag. Having an in-body antishake option makes some low light shooting possible without the extra gears. The really nice thing about this feature is that it is not lens dependent, so every lens you can mount on this type of camera can take advantage of this feature. Nikon and Canon still offers vibration reduction (VR) and image stabilization (IS) with the lens, that means you have to puchase this feature with every lens - if that feature is even available! Check out Sony/Minolta (all models), Olympus/Panasonic (not all models), and Pentax (K10d, K100d) with this feature.


6 - Sensor cleaning: This is a really nasty issue. With film, since you advance the film every time you wind it, the dust/dirt have less of a chance to create an issue with your shots. But with digital sensor, since it is in a fixed position, so specks of dust will show up on your images. At this time, from what I have read on-line, Olympus' Super Sonic Wave Filter is really the only system that is useful. The other offerings at this time does not really do a good job. None of my cameras have this feature, so I can't comment on it.

Sensor cleaning is really not very hard, but it is more of an inconvenience to me. I usually detect the dust after a shoot, since I don't usually clean the sensor before each outing. If that's what I need to do, I guess I'll just have to include that function into my workflow, but it is a pain. So to me, since the effectiveness of this built-in sensor cleaning is questionable at this time, this is not really a must for me.


7 - BIG LCD display: This is pretty much the standard issue now with newer SLRs. But if you are considering an used DSLR, this might be an issue, but shouldn't be a real deal killer.


8 - View finder: I prefer the larger, brighter view finder of the Pentax DL compared to the D70. The real nice view finder I like is the old Minolta 7000 film SLR, what a difference. Check out the view finder in person. I have heard people complaining about the view finder of the Olympus cameras, it has some type of tunnel effect. I can't say I have noticed it, but I don't use that system.


9 - Whatever you do, if you already have a P&S digicam, don't get rid of it. DSLR is nice, but having a smaller carry everywhere camera means you have less of a chance of missing shots.


10 - Battery system: Most of the DSLR utilizes Lithium-Ion rechargeables. Strange thing is, it seems like everytime a new DSLR is introduced, a different battery/charger is introduced at the same time. My personal preference is using recharageable AA NiMH batteries. At this time, only Pentax is still using these batteries (except for K10d). I have had over 500 shots per charge of nicely matched high capacity AA batteries on my DL, and they are fairly easy to obtain, and in a pinch, you can run to grocery store to pick up a set.

If you have set your mind on AA batteries, there's not much choice, Pentax or older Fuji S1/S2/S3 Pro are the only choices.

**************************************

So at this time, my personal preference is to stay with the Nikon system, because of the investment I have made with Nikon equipment, it is really just simple economics; for better pricing, I have no problem going with used D80 or D200. I have 3 primary lenses that I use: 18-70 kit, 50mm f1.8 prime for portraits, and 80-200 f2.8 for tele and portraits (bought used).

This is really a hobby for me, and I do have to think about my retirement, :~). Pentax's K10D is a possibility with anti-shake, weather seal, 10MP, top notch prime lenses available (I do have to make new purchases).

Did I miss anything? Feel free to add your comments.

New Pentax Rumors

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Hmmmm, interesting "rumor" coming around the corner from the Pentax camp:

http://www.news.com/8301-13580_3-9824461-39.html?tag=nefd.blgs


K20 and K200 coming in January 2008?

Cheap Macro, but not cheap results

Wednesday, October 3, 2007



I have always wanted a dedicated macro lens, but I know if I am ready to buy one, I want a really nice one. Either the Tamron 90mm, or the Tokina 100mm, which are the top 2 contenders at this time for me. Either of these lenses will set me back about $400, so I have to save some money first, :~(

In the mean time, I dug up my Quantaray Macro attachment (+1, +2, +4 = +7), you can find it here: http://www.ritzcamera.com/product/241663863msk.htm

The price depends on the lens thread, since this attachment screws onto your lens like a filter. I have the 52mm version, so it screws on to my Pentax kit lens (18-55) without any problem. I also use it on my Nikon 50mm f1.8, it works really well. This is another big plus, since I can use it on 2 different cameras.

The result, take a look, I like it, take a look at the image. With all 3 filters mounted on the lens, I can focus at about 2 inches away from the subject, this is setting my kit lens to 55mm.

The attachment comes with a small case, but the material they used to lined the inside of this case leaves lint on these filters, :(. Remember to clean it up before use...
Additional Samples.



Posted by Picasa

Protect your LCD

Wednesday, September 19, 2007



One thing about Nikon D70 is that it comes with this nice LCD protector. Mine is slightly scratched up now, but it's better than scratching up LCD.

The Pentax DL on the other hand, does not have this feature, so I use the Fellowes WriteRight to protec its LCD. My old cover is coming off, time for a little surgery.

I purchased a package of this WriteRight prodcut, and this is the third time I have to replace this cover on my DL.

The tools? Actually just a pair of scissors. The box cutter is there for support, :). Since this thing comes with grid line, it is easy to measure the size you need for your LCD. I alway cut it a little wider than the actual screen itself, this is to allow me to peel it off later on without using any special tools that may scratch the screen.

Cut out the material, and then lay it on the LCD screen one more time before you peel off the backing and expose the sticky side.

Voila! It's on the camera, for continous protection. The hardest part of this little project is actually get the darn bubbles out, :).
Total Time: 5 - 10 minutes.
Posted by Picasa
 

Most Reading